School DecisionSchoolDecision
School Comparison

CEDAR RIDGE ES
vs.
ANDERSEN ES

A side-by-side view of publicly reported data for these two schools.

CEDAR RIDGE ES
ANDERSEN ES
  • ANDERSEN ES reported a higher students per counselor than CEDAR RIDGE ES (432:1 vs. 397:1).
  • CEDAR RIDGE ES reported a higher chronically absent students than ANDERSEN ES (81 vs. 48).
  • ANDERSEN ES reported a higher gifted & talented than CEDAR RIDGE ES (85 vs. 61).
  • Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

CEDAR RIDGE ES reported a higher chronically absent students than ANDERSEN ES (81 vs. 48).

Course Access & Programs

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

ANDERSEN ES reported a higher gifted & talented than CEDAR RIDGE ES (85 vs. 61).

School Environment

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

CEDAR RIDGE ES reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than ANDERSEN ES (15 vs. 2).

Staffing & Support

Counselor and support staff capacity

ANDERSEN ES reported a higher students per counselor than CEDAR RIDGE ES (432:1 vs. 397:1).

Subgroup Analysis

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

15 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

Contextual Indicators

District Context

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending
CEDAR RIDGE ES
$11,333.98
ANDERSEN ES
$11,333.98
Local revenue share
CEDAR RIDGE ES
50%
ANDERSEN ES
50%
State revenue share
CEDAR RIDGE ES
36.1%
ANDERSEN ES
36.1%
Federal revenue share
CEDAR RIDGE ES
13.9%
ANDERSEN ES
13.9%
District chronic absenteeism rate
CEDAR RIDGE ES
31.2%
ANDERSEN ES
31.2%

County Economics

Both schools are located in the same county.

Median household income
Tulsa County
$67,317
Tulsa County
$67,317
Poverty rate
Tulsa County
14.7%
Tulsa County
14.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Tulsa County
33.7%
Tulsa County
33.7%
Unemployment rate
Tulsa County
3.3%
Tulsa County
3.3%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.