- Central Mountain HS reported a higher chronically absent students than Sugar Valley Rural CS (379 vs. 117).
- Central Mountain HS reported a higher graduating cohort than Sugar Valley Rural CS (293 vs. 39).
- Central Mountain HS reported a higher ap enrollment than Sugar Valley Rural CS (120 vs. 12).
- Source Data Limit: 8 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
- Source Data Limit: 3 additional metrics are reported by only one school.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
Central Mountain HS reported a higher chronically absent students than Sugar Valley Rural CS (379 vs. 117).
Graduation Outcomes
Cohort completion rates reported to federal agencies
Central Mountain HS reported a higher graduating cohort than Sugar Valley Rural CS (293 vs. 39).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
Central Mountain HS reported a higher ap enrollment than Sugar Valley Rural CS (120 vs. 12).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
Central Mountain HS reported a higher in-school suspensions than Sugar Valley Rural CS (67 vs. 13).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
Central Mountain HS reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than Sugar Valley Rural CS (3.6 vs. 0).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
21 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Reported Only at Central Mountain HS
3 metrics were reported by Central Mountain HS. Comparable data for Sugar Valley Rural CS is missing or suppressed.
Graduation rate
91%
Dual enrollment
80
Students per counselor
320.6:1
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Sugar Valley Rural CS
$17,522.2
Central Mountain HS
$20,393.19
Local revenue share
Sugar Valley Rural CS
87.4%
Central Mountain HS
41%
State revenue share
Sugar Valley Rural CS
0.3%
Central Mountain HS
48.9%
Federal revenue share
Sugar Valley Rural CS
12.3%
Central Mountain HS
10.2%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Sugar Valley Rural CS
24.7%
Central Mountain HS
25.5%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Clinton County
$58,842
Clinton County
$58,842
Poverty rate
Clinton County
14.2%
Clinton County
14.2%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Clinton County
21.3%
Clinton County
21.3%
Unemployment rate
Clinton County
4.2%
Clinton County
4.2%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.