Gillingham Charter School vs Schuylkill Technology Centers-South Camp

Schuylkill Technology Centers-South Camp reported a higher students per counselor than Gillingham Charter School (680:1 vs. 231:1).
Gillingham Charter School reported a higher chronically absent students than Schuylkill Technology Centers-South Camp (92 vs. 28).
Gillingham Charter School reported a higher in-school suspensions than Schuylkill Technology Centers-South Camp (7 vs. 0).
Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Source Data Limit: 2 additional metrics are reported by only one school.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

Gillingham Charter School reported a higher chronically absent students than Schuylkill Technology Centers-South Camp (92 vs. 28).

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

Gillingham Charter School reported a higher sat/act participation than Schuylkill Technology Centers-South Camp (2 vs. 0).

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

Gillingham Charter School reported a higher in-school suspensions than Schuylkill Technology Centers-South Camp (7 vs. 0).

Counselor and support staff capacity

Schuylkill Technology Centers-South Camp reported a higher students per counselor than Gillingham Charter School (680:1 vs. 231:1).

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

6 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

2 metrics were reported by Gillingham Charter School. Comparable data for Schuylkill Technology Centers-South Camp is missing or suppressed.

Graduating cohort

Dual enrollment

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending

Gillingham Charter School

$17,858.3