- Bedford El Sch reported a higher students per counselor than Chestnut Ridge MS (758:1 vs. 417:1).
- Bedford El Sch reported a higher chronically absent students than Chestnut Ridge MS (124 vs. 45).
- Chestnut Ridge MS reported a higher gifted & talented than Bedford El Sch (27 vs. 11).
- Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
Bedford El Sch reported a higher chronically absent students than Chestnut Ridge MS (124 vs. 45).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
Chestnut Ridge MS reported a higher gifted & talented than Bedford El Sch (27 vs. 11).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
Chestnut Ridge MS reported a higher in-school suspensions than Bedford El Sch (15 vs. 6).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
Bedford El Sch reported a higher students per counselor than Chestnut Ridge MS (758:1 vs. 417:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
8 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Bedford El Sch
$16,887.46
Chestnut Ridge MS
$17,125.4
Local revenue share
Bedford El Sch
47.1%
Chestnut Ridge MS
31.8%
State revenue share
Bedford El Sch
41.9%
Chestnut Ridge MS
60.9%
Federal revenue share
Bedford El Sch
11%
Chestnut Ridge MS
7.3%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Bedford El Sch
19.4%
Chestnut Ridge MS
15.8%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Bedford County
$60,302
Bedford County
$60,302
Poverty rate
Bedford County
11%
Bedford County
11%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Bedford County
16.4%
Bedford County
16.4%
Unemployment rate
Bedford County
3.8%
Bedford County
3.8%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.