- Beaver Falls MS reported a higher chronically absent students than Rochester MS (125 vs. 38).
- Beaver Falls MS reported a higher in-school suspensions than Rochester MS (41 vs. 0).
- Beaver Falls MS reported a higher students per counselor than Rochester MS (194:1 vs. 163:1).
- Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
Beaver Falls MS reported a higher chronically absent students than Rochester MS (125 vs. 38).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
Beaver Falls MS reported a higher gifted & talented than Rochester MS (15 vs. 5).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
Beaver Falls MS reported a higher in-school suspensions than Rochester MS (41 vs. 0).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
Beaver Falls MS reported a higher students per counselor than Rochester MS (194:1 vs. 163:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
14 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Beaver Falls MS
$16,241.3
Rochester MS
$23,502.07
Local revenue share
Beaver Falls MS
23.7%
Rochester MS
28.3%
State revenue share
Beaver Falls MS
60.5%
Rochester MS
58.4%
Federal revenue share
Beaver Falls MS
15.8%
Rochester MS
13.4%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Beaver Falls MS
32.5%
Rochester MS
27.7%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Beaver County
$70,156
Beaver County
$70,156
Poverty rate
Beaver County
10.1%
Beaver County
10.1%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Beaver County
28.3%
Beaver County
28.3%
Unemployment rate
Beaver County
3.9%
Beaver County
3.9%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.