- Martin Meylin MS reported a higher students per counselor than Smith MS (424.7:1 vs. 403:1).
- Smith MS reported a higher chronically absent students than Martin Meylin MS (80 vs. 65).
- Smith MS reported a higher violent incidents than Martin Meylin MS (17 vs. 8).
- Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
Smith MS reported a higher chronically absent students than Martin Meylin MS (80 vs. 65).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
Martin Meylin MS reported a higher gifted & talented than Smith MS (37 vs. 31).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
Smith MS reported a higher violent incidents than Martin Meylin MS (17 vs. 8).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
Martin Meylin MS reported a higher students per counselor than Smith MS (424.7:1 vs. 403:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
14 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Martin Meylin MS
$17,013.06
Smith MS
$17,632
Local revenue share
Martin Meylin MS
71.9%
Smith MS
55.4%
State revenue share
Martin Meylin MS
21.8%
Smith MS
29.7%
Federal revenue share
Martin Meylin MS
6.3%
Smith MS
15%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Martin Meylin MS
9.2%
Smith MS
19.2%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Lancaster County
$83,703
Lancaster County
$83,703
Poverty rate
Lancaster County
8.7%
Lancaster County
8.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Lancaster County
31%
Lancaster County
31%
Unemployment rate
Lancaster County
2.9%
Lancaster County
2.9%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.