School DecisionSchoolDecision
School Comparison

Smith MS
vs.
Swift MS

A side-by-side view of publicly reported data for these two schools.

Smith MS
Swift MS
  • Smith MS reported a higher students per counselor than Swift MS (403:1 vs. 318:1).
  • Smith MS reported a higher chronically absent students than Swift MS (80 vs. 53).
  • Smith MS reported a higher in-school suspensions than Swift MS (18 vs. 11).
  • Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

Smith MS reported a higher chronically absent students than Swift MS (80 vs. 53).

Course Access & Programs

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

Smith MS reported a higher gifted & talented than Swift MS (31 vs. 27).

School Environment

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

Smith MS reported a higher in-school suspensions than Swift MS (18 vs. 11).

Staffing & Support

Counselor and support staff capacity

Smith MS reported a higher students per counselor than Swift MS (403:1 vs. 318:1).

Subgroup Analysis

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

11 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

Contextual Indicators

District Context

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending
Smith MS
$17,632
Swift MS
$17,632
Local revenue share
Smith MS
55.4%
Swift MS
55.4%
State revenue share
Smith MS
29.7%
Swift MS
29.7%
Federal revenue share
Smith MS
15%
Swift MS
15%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Smith MS
19.2%
Swift MS
19.2%

County Economics

Both schools are located in the same county.

Median household income
Lancaster County
$83,703
Lancaster County
$83,703
Poverty rate
Lancaster County
8.7%
Lancaster County
8.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Lancaster County
31%
Lancaster County
31%
Unemployment rate
Lancaster County
2.9%
Lancaster County
2.9%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.