B. T. Washington High vs Hollis F. Price Middle College

B. T. Washington High reported a higher dual enrollment than Hollis F. Price Middle College (275 vs. 50).
B. T. Washington High reported a higher students per counselor than Hollis F. Price Middle College (239:1 vs. 82:1).
B. T. Washington High reported a higher sat/act participation than Hollis F. Price Middle College (135 vs. 65).
Source Data Limit: 6 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Source Data Limit: 2 additional metrics are reported by only one school.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

B. T. Washington High reported a higher chronically absent students than Hollis F. Price Middle College (42 vs. 18).

Cohort completion rates reported to federal agencies

B. T. Washington High reported a higher graduating cohort than Hollis F. Price Middle College (78 vs. 28).

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

B. T. Washington High reported a higher dual enrollment than Hollis F. Price Middle College (275 vs. 50).

Counselor and support staff capacity

B. T. Washington High reported a higher students per counselor than Hollis F. Price Middle College (239:1 vs. 82:1).

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

10 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

2 metrics were reported by B. T. Washington High. Comparable data for Hollis F. Price Middle College is missing or suppressed.

AP courses offered

AP enrollment

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending

B. T. Washington High

$13,694.79