Cookeville High School vs VITAL: Upper Cumberland e-Learning Network

Cookeville High School reported a higher sat/act participation than VITAL: Upper Cumberland e-Learning Network (591 vs. 22).
Cookeville High School reported a higher graduating cohort than VITAL: Upper Cumberland e-Learning Network (550 vs. 7).
Cookeville High School reported a higher chronically absent students than VITAL: Upper Cumberland e-Learning Network (568 vs. 27).
Source Data Limit: 6 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Source Data Limit: 5 additional metrics are reported by only one school.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

Cookeville High School reported a higher chronically absent students than VITAL: Upper Cumberland e-Learning Network (568 vs. 27).

Cohort completion rates reported to federal agencies

Cookeville High School reported a higher graduating cohort than VITAL: Upper Cumberland e-Learning Network (550 vs. 7).

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

Cookeville High School reported a higher sat/act participation than VITAL: Upper Cumberland e-Learning Network (591 vs. 22).

Counselor and support staff capacity

Cookeville High School reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than VITAL: Upper Cumberland e-Learning Network (2 vs. 0).

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

20 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

5 metrics were reported by Cookeville High School. Comparable data for VITAL: Upper Cumberland e-Learning Network is missing or suppressed.

Graduation rate

92%

IB enrollment

Dual enrollment

726

Gifted & talented

Students per counselor

1096.5:1

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending

Cookeville High School

$10,619.1