LIFE SCHOOL CEDAR HILL vs NEWMAN INTERNATIONAL AT CEDAR HILL

LIFE SCHOOL CEDAR HILL reported a higher students per counselor than NEWMAN INTERNATIONAL AT CEDAR HILL (505:1 vs. 151.2:1).
NEWMAN INTERNATIONAL AT CEDAR HILL reported a higher in-school suspensions than LIFE SCHOOL CEDAR HILL (63 vs. 20).
NEWMAN INTERNATIONAL AT CEDAR HILL reported a higher chronically absent students than LIFE SCHOOL CEDAR HILL (101 vs. 63).
Source Data Limit: 6 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Source Data Limit: 5 additional metrics are reported by only one school.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

NEWMAN INTERNATIONAL AT CEDAR HILL reported a higher chronically absent students than LIFE SCHOOL CEDAR HILL (101 vs. 63).

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

NEWMAN INTERNATIONAL AT CEDAR HILL reported a higher gifted & talented than LIFE SCHOOL CEDAR HILL (32 vs. 16).

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

NEWMAN INTERNATIONAL AT CEDAR HILL reported a higher in-school suspensions than LIFE SCHOOL CEDAR HILL (63 vs. 20).

Counselor and support staff capacity

LIFE SCHOOL CEDAR HILL reported a higher students per counselor than NEWMAN INTERNATIONAL AT CEDAR HILL (505:1 vs. 151.2:1).

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

12 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

5 metrics were reported by NEWMAN INTERNATIONAL AT CEDAR HILL. Comparable data for LIFE SCHOOL CEDAR HILL is missing or suppressed.

Graduating cohort

AP courses offered

AP enrollment

Dual enrollment

SAT/ACT participation

147

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending

LIFE SCHOOL CEDAR HILL

$10,429.79