- LINDER EL reported a higher chronically absent students than KIPP PASEO PRI (237 vs. 66).
- LINDER EL reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than KIPP PASEO PRI (2 vs. 0).
- Source Data Limit: 2 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
- Source Data Limit: 2 additional metrics are reported by only one school.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
LINDER EL reported a higher chronically absent students than KIPP PASEO PRI (237 vs. 66).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
LINDER EL reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than KIPP PASEO PRI (2 vs. 0).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
13 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Reported Only at LINDER EL
2 metrics were reported by LINDER EL. Comparable data for KIPP PASEO PRI is missing or suppressed.
Gifted & talented
25
Students per counselor
236.5:1
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
KIPP PASEO PRI
$13,447.38
LINDER EL
$12,949.65
Local revenue share
KIPP PASEO PRI
5%
LINDER EL
76.2%
State revenue share
KIPP PASEO PRI
70%
LINDER EL
6.5%
Federal revenue share
KIPP PASEO PRI
24.9%
LINDER EL
17.3%
District chronic absenteeism rate
KIPP PASEO PRI
20.9%
LINDER EL
32.4%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Travis County
$97,169
Travis County
$97,169
Poverty rate
Travis County
11%
Travis County
11%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Travis County
55.5%
Travis County
55.5%
Unemployment rate
Travis County
3.5%
Travis County
3.5%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.