NEWMAN INTERNATIONAL AT CEDAR HILL vs W S PERMENTER MIDDLE

W S PERMENTER MIDDLE reported a higher students per counselor than NEWMAN INTERNATIONAL AT CEDAR HILL (357.5:1 vs. 151.2:1).
W S PERMENTER MIDDLE reported a higher chronically absent students than NEWMAN INTERNATIONAL AT CEDAR HILL (226 vs. 101).
W S PERMENTER MIDDLE reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than NEWMAN INTERNATIONAL AT CEDAR HILL (108 vs. 42).
Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Source Data Limit: 5 additional metrics are reported by only one school.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

W S PERMENTER MIDDLE reported a higher chronically absent students than NEWMAN INTERNATIONAL AT CEDAR HILL (226 vs. 101).

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

W S PERMENTER MIDDLE reported a higher gifted & talented than NEWMAN INTERNATIONAL AT CEDAR HILL (42 vs. 32).

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

W S PERMENTER MIDDLE reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than NEWMAN INTERNATIONAL AT CEDAR HILL (108 vs. 42).

Counselor and support staff capacity

W S PERMENTER MIDDLE reported a higher students per counselor than NEWMAN INTERNATIONAL AT CEDAR HILL (357.5:1 vs. 151.2:1).

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

13 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

5 metrics were reported by NEWMAN INTERNATIONAL AT CEDAR HILL. Comparable data for W S PERMENTER MIDDLE is missing or suppressed.

Graduating cohort

AP courses offered

AP enrollment

Dual enrollment

SAT/ACT participation

147