UT TYLER UNIVERSITY ACADEMY AT PALESTINE vs FRANKSTON H S

FRANKSTON H S reported a higher dual enrollment than UT TYLER UNIVERSITY ACADEMY AT PALESTINE (65 vs. 25).
FRANKSTON H S reported a higher chronically absent students than UT TYLER UNIVERSITY ACADEMY AT PALESTINE (44 vs. 17).
UT TYLER UNIVERSITY ACADEMY AT PALESTINE reported a higher sat/act participation than FRANKSTON H S (25 vs. 0).
Source Data Limit: 8 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Source Data Limit: 1 additional metric is reported by only one school.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

FRANKSTON H S reported a higher chronically absent students than UT TYLER UNIVERSITY ACADEMY AT PALESTINE (44 vs. 17).

Cohort completion rates reported to federal agencies

FRANKSTON H S reported a higher graduating cohort than UT TYLER UNIVERSITY ACADEMY AT PALESTINE (42 vs. 19).

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

FRANKSTON H S reported a higher dual enrollment than UT TYLER UNIVERSITY ACADEMY AT PALESTINE (65 vs. 25).

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

UT TYLER UNIVERSITY ACADEMY AT PALESTINE reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than FRANKSTON H S (5 vs. 0).

Counselor and support staff capacity

UT TYLER UNIVERSITY ACADEMY AT PALESTINE reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than FRANKSTON H S (0.3 vs. 0).

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

14 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

1 metric was reported by UT TYLER UNIVERSITY ACADEMY AT PALESTINE. Comparable data for FRANKSTON H S is missing or suppressed.

Students per counselor

803.3:1