- LAUREL MOUNTAIN EL reported a higher students per counselor than DAVIS EL (500:1 vs. 282.5:1).
- DAVIS EL reported a higher chronically absent students than LAUREL MOUNTAIN EL (123 vs. 64).
- LAUREL MOUNTAIN EL reported a higher gifted & talented than DAVIS EL (85 vs. 47).
- Source Data Limit: 5 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
DAVIS EL reported a higher chronically absent students than LAUREL MOUNTAIN EL (123 vs. 64).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
LAUREL MOUNTAIN EL reported a higher gifted & talented than DAVIS EL (85 vs. 47).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
LAUREL MOUNTAIN EL reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than DAVIS EL (1 vs. 0).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
LAUREL MOUNTAIN EL reported a higher students per counselor than DAVIS EL (500:1 vs. 282.5:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
14 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
DAVIS EL
$12,949.65
LAUREL MOUNTAIN EL
$10,954.85
Local revenue share
DAVIS EL
76.2%
LAUREL MOUNTAIN EL
82.6%
State revenue share
DAVIS EL
6.5%
LAUREL MOUNTAIN EL
8.9%
Federal revenue share
DAVIS EL
17.3%
LAUREL MOUNTAIN EL
8.5%
District chronic absenteeism rate
DAVIS EL
32.4%
LAUREL MOUNTAIN EL
19.5%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Travis County
$97,169
Travis County
$97,169
Poverty rate
Travis County
11%
Travis County
11%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Travis County
55.5%
Travis County
55.5%
Unemployment rate
Travis County
3.5%
Travis County
3.5%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.