- HUGHES MIDDLE reported a higher chronically absent students than TOM AND NITA NICHOLS MIDDLE (166 vs. 61).
- HUGHES MIDDLE reported a higher students per counselor than TOM AND NITA NICHOLS MIDDLE (353.7:1 vs. 295.5:1).
- HUGHES MIDDLE reported a higher in-school suspensions than TOM AND NITA NICHOLS MIDDLE (99 vs. 49).
- Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
HUGHES MIDDLE reported a higher chronically absent students than TOM AND NITA NICHOLS MIDDLE (166 vs. 61).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
HUGHES MIDDLE reported a higher gifted & talented than TOM AND NITA NICHOLS MIDDLE (40 vs. 22).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
HUGHES MIDDLE reported a higher in-school suspensions than TOM AND NITA NICHOLS MIDDLE (99 vs. 49).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
HUGHES MIDDLE reported a higher students per counselor than TOM AND NITA NICHOLS MIDDLE (353.7:1 vs. 295.5:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
12 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
HUGHES MIDDLE
$10,161.76
TOM AND NITA NICHOLS MIDDLE
$12,068.06
Local revenue share
HUGHES MIDDLE
59.1%
TOM AND NITA NICHOLS MIDDLE
43.7%
State revenue share
HUGHES MIDDLE
33.6%
TOM AND NITA NICHOLS MIDDLE
45.7%
Federal revenue share
HUGHES MIDDLE
7.3%
TOM AND NITA NICHOLS MIDDLE
10.6%
District chronic absenteeism rate
HUGHES MIDDLE
19.4%
TOM AND NITA NICHOLS MIDDLE
14.3%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Johnson County
$81,826
Johnson County
$81,826
Poverty rate
Johnson County
10.7%
Johnson County
10.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Johnson County
23.5%
Johnson County
23.5%
Unemployment rate
Johnson County
3.6%
Johnson County
3.6%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.