GAME DEVELOPMENT DESIGN SCHOOL vs TOM AND NITA NICHOLS MIDDLE

TOM AND NITA NICHOLS MIDDLE reported a higher violent incidents than GAME DEVELOPMENT DESIGN SCHOOL (32 vs. 2).
TOM AND NITA NICHOLS MIDDLE reported a higher in-school suspensions than GAME DEVELOPMENT DESIGN SCHOOL (49 vs. 23).
TOM AND NITA NICHOLS MIDDLE reported a higher chronically absent students than GAME DEVELOPMENT DESIGN SCHOOL (61 vs. 37).
Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Source Data Limit: 3 additional metrics are reported by only one school.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

TOM AND NITA NICHOLS MIDDLE reported a higher chronically absent students than GAME DEVELOPMENT DESIGN SCHOOL (61 vs. 37).

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

GAME DEVELOPMENT DESIGN SCHOOL reported a higher gifted & talented than TOM AND NITA NICHOLS MIDDLE (43 vs. 22).

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

TOM AND NITA NICHOLS MIDDLE reported a higher violent incidents than GAME DEVELOPMENT DESIGN SCHOOL (32 vs. 2).

Counselor and support staff capacity

GAME DEVELOPMENT DESIGN SCHOOL reported a higher students per counselor than TOM AND NITA NICHOLS MIDDLE (313:1 vs. 295.5:1).

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

11 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

3 metrics were reported by GAME DEVELOPMENT DESIGN SCHOOL. Comparable data for TOM AND NITA NICHOLS MIDDLE is missing or suppressed.

AP courses offered

AP enrollment

SAT/ACT participation