- DAVID EL reported a higher students per counselor than RIDE EL (620:1 vs. 448:1).
- DAVID EL reported a higher gifted & talented than RIDE EL (78 vs. 44).
- RIDE EL reported a higher chronically absent students than DAVID EL (52 vs. 49).
- Source Data Limit: 4 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
RIDE EL reported a higher chronically absent students than DAVID EL (52 vs. 49).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
DAVID EL reported a higher gifted & talented than RIDE EL (78 vs. 44).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
DAVID EL reported a higher students per counselor than RIDE EL (620:1 vs. 448:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
13 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
RIDE EL
$10,348.73
DAVID EL
$10,348.73
Local revenue share
RIDE EL
67.6%
DAVID EL
67.6%
State revenue share
RIDE EL
21.6%
DAVID EL
21.6%
Federal revenue share
RIDE EL
10.8%
DAVID EL
10.8%
District chronic absenteeism rate
RIDE EL
15.1%
DAVID EL
15.1%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Montgomery County
$97,266
Montgomery County
$97,266
Poverty rate
Montgomery County
9.3%
Montgomery County
9.3%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Montgomery County
37.9%
Montgomery County
37.9%
Unemployment rate
Montgomery County
4%
Montgomery County
4%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.