- LORENZO DE ZAVALA EL reported a higher students per counselor than HOGG NEW TECH CENTER (449.5:1 vs. 301:1).
- LORENZO DE ZAVALA EL reported a higher gifted & talented than HOGG NEW TECH CENTER (73 vs. 43).
- LORENZO DE ZAVALA EL reported a higher chronically absent students than HOGG NEW TECH CENTER (63 vs. 52).
- Source Data Limit: 4 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
LORENZO DE ZAVALA EL reported a higher chronically absent students than HOGG NEW TECH CENTER (63 vs. 52).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
LORENZO DE ZAVALA EL reported a higher gifted & talented than HOGG NEW TECH CENTER (73 vs. 43).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
LORENZO DE ZAVALA EL reported a higher students per counselor than HOGG NEW TECH CENTER (449.5:1 vs. 301:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
9 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
HOGG NEW TECH CENTER
$14,469.76
LORENZO DE ZAVALA EL
$14,469.76
Local revenue share
HOGG NEW TECH CENTER
69.7%
LORENZO DE ZAVALA EL
69.7%
State revenue share
HOGG NEW TECH CENTER
6.6%
LORENZO DE ZAVALA EL
6.6%
Federal revenue share
HOGG NEW TECH CENTER
23.8%
LORENZO DE ZAVALA EL
23.8%
District chronic absenteeism rate
HOGG NEW TECH CENTER
27.7%
LORENZO DE ZAVALA EL
27.7%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Dallas County
$74,149
Dallas County
$74,149
Poverty rate
Dallas County
14%
Dallas County
14%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Dallas County
34.9%
Dallas County
34.9%
Unemployment rate
Dallas County
4.1%
Dallas County
4.1%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.