- EDWIN J KIEST EL reported a higher students per counselor than MOTLEY EL (614.1:1 vs. 229:1).
- EDWIN J KIEST EL reported a higher gifted & talented than MOTLEY EL (104 vs. 9).
- EDWIN J KIEST EL reported a higher chronically absent students than MOTLEY EL (83 vs. 16).
- Source Data Limit: 5 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
EDWIN J KIEST EL reported a higher chronically absent students than MOTLEY EL (83 vs. 16).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
EDWIN J KIEST EL reported a higher gifted & talented than MOTLEY EL (104 vs. 9).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
MOTLEY EL reported a higher in-school suspensions than EDWIN J KIEST EL (5 vs. 0).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
EDWIN J KIEST EL reported a higher students per counselor than MOTLEY EL (614.1:1 vs. 229:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
9 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
EDWIN J KIEST EL
$14,469.76
MOTLEY EL
$12,222.89
Local revenue share
EDWIN J KIEST EL
69.7%
MOTLEY EL
31.3%
State revenue share
EDWIN J KIEST EL
6.6%
MOTLEY EL
46.7%
Federal revenue share
EDWIN J KIEST EL
23.8%
MOTLEY EL
22.1%
District chronic absenteeism rate
EDWIN J KIEST EL
27.7%
MOTLEY EL
25.1%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Dallas County
$74,149
Dallas County
$74,149
Poverty rate
Dallas County
14%
Dallas County
14%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Dallas County
34.9%
Dallas County
34.9%
Unemployment rate
Dallas County
4.1%
Dallas County
4.1%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.