- DAN D ROGERS EL reported a higher students per counselor than JILL STONE EL AT VICKERY MEADOW (418.2:1 vs. 374.7:1).
- DAN D ROGERS EL reported a higher gifted & talented than JILL STONE EL AT VICKERY MEADOW (73 vs. 30).
- JILL STONE EL AT VICKERY MEADOW reported a higher chronically absent students than DAN D ROGERS EL (80 vs. 58).
- Source Data Limit: 4 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
JILL STONE EL AT VICKERY MEADOW reported a higher chronically absent students than DAN D ROGERS EL (80 vs. 58).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
DAN D ROGERS EL reported a higher gifted & talented than JILL STONE EL AT VICKERY MEADOW (73 vs. 30).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
DAN D ROGERS EL reported a higher students per counselor than JILL STONE EL AT VICKERY MEADOW (418.2:1 vs. 374.7:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
13 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
DAN D ROGERS EL
$14,469.76
JILL STONE EL AT VICKERY MEADOW
$14,469.76
Local revenue share
DAN D ROGERS EL
69.7%
JILL STONE EL AT VICKERY MEADOW
69.7%
State revenue share
DAN D ROGERS EL
6.6%
JILL STONE EL AT VICKERY MEADOW
6.6%
Federal revenue share
DAN D ROGERS EL
23.8%
JILL STONE EL AT VICKERY MEADOW
23.8%
District chronic absenteeism rate
DAN D ROGERS EL
27.7%
JILL STONE EL AT VICKERY MEADOW
27.7%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Dallas County
$74,149
Dallas County
$74,149
Poverty rate
Dallas County
14%
Dallas County
14%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Dallas County
34.9%
Dallas County
34.9%
Unemployment rate
Dallas County
4.1%
Dallas County
4.1%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.