- THOMAS J RUSK MIDDLE reported a higher students per counselor than HYBRID FUTURE SCHOOL (258.5:1 vs. 68.7:1).
- THOMAS J RUSK MIDDLE reported a higher chronically absent students than HYBRID FUTURE SCHOOL (149 vs. 23).
- THOMAS J RUSK MIDDLE reported a higher gifted & talented than HYBRID FUTURE SCHOOL (86 vs. 19).
- Source Data Limit: 5 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
THOMAS J RUSK MIDDLE reported a higher chronically absent students than HYBRID FUTURE SCHOOL (149 vs. 23).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
THOMAS J RUSK MIDDLE reported a higher gifted & talented than HYBRID FUTURE SCHOOL (86 vs. 19).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
THOMAS J RUSK MIDDLE reported a higher in-school suspensions than HYBRID FUTURE SCHOOL (13 vs. 0).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
THOMAS J RUSK MIDDLE reported a higher students per counselor than HYBRID FUTURE SCHOOL (258.5:1 vs. 68.7:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
11 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
THOMAS J RUSK MIDDLE
$14,469.76
HYBRID FUTURE SCHOOL
$14,469.76
Local revenue share
THOMAS J RUSK MIDDLE
69.7%
HYBRID FUTURE SCHOOL
69.7%
State revenue share
THOMAS J RUSK MIDDLE
6.6%
HYBRID FUTURE SCHOOL
6.6%
Federal revenue share
THOMAS J RUSK MIDDLE
23.8%
HYBRID FUTURE SCHOOL
23.8%
District chronic absenteeism rate
THOMAS J RUSK MIDDLE
27.7%
HYBRID FUTURE SCHOOL
27.7%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Dallas County
$74,149
Dallas County
$74,149
Poverty rate
Dallas County
14%
Dallas County
14%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Dallas County
34.9%
Dallas County
34.9%
Unemployment rate
Dallas County
4.1%
Dallas County
4.1%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.