- DE LA VINA ELEM reported a higher students per counselor than LEE EL (440:1 vs. 294:1).
- DE LA VINA ELEM reported a higher chronically absent students than LEE EL (156 vs. 131).
- DE LA VINA ELEM reported a higher gifted & talented than LEE EL (20 vs. 13).
- Source Data Limit: 4 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
DE LA VINA ELEM reported a higher chronically absent students than LEE EL (156 vs. 131).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
DE LA VINA ELEM reported a higher gifted & talented than LEE EL (20 vs. 13).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
DE LA VINA ELEM reported a higher students per counselor than LEE EL (440:1 vs. 294:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
10 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
LEE EL
$13,128.87
DE LA VINA ELEM
$13,128.87
Local revenue share
LEE EL
21.2%
DE LA VINA ELEM
21.2%
State revenue share
LEE EL
49.6%
DE LA VINA ELEM
49.6%
Federal revenue share
LEE EL
29.2%
DE LA VINA ELEM
29.2%
District chronic absenteeism rate
LEE EL
31.8%
DE LA VINA ELEM
31.8%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Hidalgo County
$52,281
Hidalgo County
$52,281
Poverty rate
Hidalgo County
27.2%
Hidalgo County
27.2%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Hidalgo County
20.3%
Hidalgo County
20.3%
Unemployment rate
Hidalgo County
6%
Hidalgo County
6%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.