School DecisionSchoolDecision
School Comparison

RUSK EL
vs.
TRAVIS EL

A side-by-side view of publicly reported data for these two schools.

RUSK EL
TRAVIS EL
  • TRAVIS EL reported a higher chronically absent students than RUSK EL (83 vs. 74).
  • RUSK EL reported a higher in-school suspensions than TRAVIS EL (4 vs. 0).
  • RUSK EL reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than TRAVIS EL (5 vs. 2).
  • Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

TRAVIS EL reported a higher chronically absent students than RUSK EL (83 vs. 74).

Course Access & Programs

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

TRAVIS EL reported a higher gifted & talented than RUSK EL (10 vs. 8).

School Environment

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

RUSK EL reported a higher in-school suspensions than TRAVIS EL (4 vs. 0).

Staffing & Support

Counselor and support staff capacity

Subgroup Analysis

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

9 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

Contextual Indicators

District Context

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending
RUSK EL
$12,931.24
TRAVIS EL
$12,931.24
Local revenue share
RUSK EL
36.3%
TRAVIS EL
36.3%
State revenue share
RUSK EL
40.3%
TRAVIS EL
40.3%
Federal revenue share
RUSK EL
23.4%
TRAVIS EL
23.4%
District chronic absenteeism rate
RUSK EL
36.1%
TRAVIS EL
36.1%

County Economics

Both schools are located in the same county.

Median household income
El Paso County
$58,859
El Paso County
$58,859
Poverty rate
El Paso County
18.9%
El Paso County
18.9%
Bachelor's degree or higher
El Paso County
25.4%
El Paso County
25.4%
Unemployment rate
El Paso County
4.2%
El Paso County
4.2%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.