- CARVER EL reported a higher students per counselor than WOLF RANCH EL (698:1 vs. 621:1).
- WOLF RANCH EL reported a higher chronically absent students than CARVER EL (152 vs. 113).
- CARVER EL reported a higher gifted & talented than WOLF RANCH EL (42 vs. 27).
- Source Data Limit: 6 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
WOLF RANCH EL reported a higher chronically absent students than CARVER EL (152 vs. 113).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
CARVER EL reported a higher gifted & talented than WOLF RANCH EL (42 vs. 27).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
CARVER EL reported a higher in-school suspensions than WOLF RANCH EL (5 vs. 1).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
CARVER EL reported a higher students per counselor than WOLF RANCH EL (698:1 vs. 621:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
15 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
CARVER EL
$11,236.41
WOLF RANCH EL
$11,236.41
Local revenue share
CARVER EL
85.3%
WOLF RANCH EL
85.3%
State revenue share
CARVER EL
7.4%
WOLF RANCH EL
7.4%
Federal revenue share
CARVER EL
7.4%
WOLF RANCH EL
7.4%
District chronic absenteeism rate
CARVER EL
20.3%
WOLF RANCH EL
20.3%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Williamson County
$108,309
Williamson County
$108,309
Poverty rate
Williamson County
6.3%
Williamson County
6.3%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Williamson County
47.4%
Williamson County
47.4%
Unemployment rate
Williamson County
3.6%
Williamson County
3.6%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.