- FANNIN EL reported a higher students per counselor than GRAPE CREEK INT (310:1 vs. 103.5:1).
- GRAPE CREEK INT reported a higher gifted & talented than FANNIN EL (13 vs. 1).
- FANNIN EL reported a higher chronically absent students than GRAPE CREEK INT (48 vs. 38).
- Source Data Limit: 6 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
FANNIN EL reported a higher chronically absent students than GRAPE CREEK INT (48 vs. 38).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
GRAPE CREEK INT reported a higher gifted & talented than FANNIN EL (13 vs. 1).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
FANNIN EL reported a higher in-school suspensions than GRAPE CREEK INT (3 vs. 0).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
FANNIN EL reported a higher students per counselor than GRAPE CREEK INT (310:1 vs. 103.5:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
9 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
GRAPE CREEK INT
$12,200.51
FANNIN EL
$10,683.94
Local revenue share
GRAPE CREEK INT
27.5%
FANNIN EL
42.2%
State revenue share
GRAPE CREEK INT
51.3%
FANNIN EL
35.9%
Federal revenue share
GRAPE CREEK INT
21.2%
FANNIN EL
21.9%
District chronic absenteeism rate
GRAPE CREEK INT
21.7%
FANNIN EL
19.8%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Tom Green County
$66,254
Tom Green County
$66,254
Poverty rate
Tom Green County
11.7%
Tom Green County
11.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Tom Green County
25.1%
Tom Green County
25.1%
Unemployment rate
Tom Green County
3.2%
Tom Green County
3.2%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.