KINDER H S FOR PERFORMING AND VISUAL ARTS vs H S FOR LAW AND JUSTICE

KINDER H S FOR PERFORMING AND VISUAL ARTS reported a higher gifted & talented than H S FOR LAW AND JUSTICE (772 vs. 141).
KINDER H S FOR PERFORMING AND VISUAL ARTS reported a higher ap enrollment than H S FOR LAW AND JUSTICE (417 vs. 209).
KINDER H S FOR PERFORMING AND VISUAL ARTS reported a higher sat/act participation than H S FOR LAW AND JUSTICE (151 vs. 44).
Source Data Limit: 10 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

H S FOR LAW AND JUSTICE reported a higher chronically absent students than KINDER H S FOR PERFORMING AND VISUAL ARTS (37 vs. 29).

Cohort completion rates reported to federal agencies

KINDER H S FOR PERFORMING AND VISUAL ARTS reported a higher graduating cohort than H S FOR LAW AND JUSTICE (182 vs. 87).

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

KINDER H S FOR PERFORMING AND VISUAL ARTS reported a higher gifted & talented than H S FOR LAW AND JUSTICE (772 vs. 141).

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

H S FOR LAW AND JUSTICE reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than KINDER H S FOR PERFORMING AND VISUAL ARTS (8 vs. 0).

Counselor and support staff capacity

H S FOR LAW AND JUSTICE reported a higher students per counselor than KINDER H S FOR PERFORMING AND VISUAL ARTS (439:1 vs. 391.5:1).

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

18 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.