- BONHAM EL reported a higher students per counselor than RUSK EL (462:1 vs. 371:1).
- BONHAM EL reported a higher chronically absent students than RUSK EL (185 vs. 121).
- BONHAM EL reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than RUSK EL (9 vs. 2).
- Source Data Limit: 6 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
BONHAM EL reported a higher chronically absent students than RUSK EL (185 vs. 121).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
BONHAM EL reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than RUSK EL (9 vs. 2).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
BONHAM EL reported a higher students per counselor than RUSK EL (462:1 vs. 371:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
14 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
BONHAM EL
$11,366.93
RUSK EL
$11,366.93
Local revenue share
BONHAM EL
67.3%
RUSK EL
67.3%
State revenue share
BONHAM EL
19.9%
RUSK EL
19.9%
Federal revenue share
BONHAM EL
12.8%
RUSK EL
12.8%
District chronic absenteeism rate
BONHAM EL
29.1%
RUSK EL
29.1%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Midland County
$93,984
Midland County
$93,984
Poverty rate
Midland County
10.6%
Midland County
10.6%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Midland County
30.9%
Midland County
30.9%
Unemployment rate
Midland County
2.9%
Midland County
2.9%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.