- LIZZIE CURTIS EL reported a higher students per counselor than SONNY & ALLEGRA NANCE EL (555:1 vs. 476:1).
- LIZZIE CURTIS EL reported a higher gifted & talented than SONNY & ALLEGRA NANCE EL (47 vs. 23).
- LIZZIE CURTIS EL reported a higher chronically absent students than SONNY & ALLEGRA NANCE EL (71 vs. 52).
- Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
LIZZIE CURTIS EL reported a higher chronically absent students than SONNY & ALLEGRA NANCE EL (71 vs. 52).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
LIZZIE CURTIS EL reported a higher gifted & talented than SONNY & ALLEGRA NANCE EL (47 vs. 23).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
SONNY & ALLEGRA NANCE EL reported a higher in-school suspensions than LIZZIE CURTIS EL (7 vs. 4).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
LIZZIE CURTIS EL reported a higher students per counselor than SONNY & ALLEGRA NANCE EL (555:1 vs. 476:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
15 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
SONNY & ALLEGRA NANCE EL
$10,236.19
LIZZIE CURTIS EL
$10,236.19
Local revenue share
SONNY & ALLEGRA NANCE EL
87.1%
LIZZIE CURTIS EL
87.1%
State revenue share
SONNY & ALLEGRA NANCE EL
7.4%
LIZZIE CURTIS EL
7.4%
Federal revenue share
SONNY & ALLEGRA NANCE EL
5.5%
LIZZIE CURTIS EL
5.5%
District chronic absenteeism rate
SONNY & ALLEGRA NANCE EL
13.8%
LIZZIE CURTIS EL
13.8%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Tarrant County
$81,905
Tarrant County
$81,905
Poverty rate
Tarrant County
10.9%
Tarrant County
10.9%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Tarrant County
34.6%
Tarrant County
34.6%
Unemployment rate
Tarrant County
3.9%
Tarrant County
3.9%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.