School DecisionSchoolDecision
School Comparison

PLEASANT GROVE INT
vs.
NASH EL

A side-by-side view of publicly reported data for these two schools.

PLEASANT GROVE INT
NASH EL
  • NASH EL reported a higher students per counselor than PLEASANT GROVE INT (593:1 vs. 465:1).
  • NASH EL reported a higher chronically absent students than PLEASANT GROVE INT (114 vs. 40).
  • NASH EL reported a higher in-school suspensions than PLEASANT GROVE INT (10 vs. 0).
  • Source Data Limit: 6 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

NASH EL reported a higher chronically absent students than PLEASANT GROVE INT (114 vs. 40).

Course Access & Programs

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

School Environment

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

NASH EL reported a higher in-school suspensions than PLEASANT GROVE INT (10 vs. 0).

Staffing & Support

Counselor and support staff capacity

NASH EL reported a higher students per counselor than PLEASANT GROVE INT (593:1 vs. 465:1).

Subgroup Analysis

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

11 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

Contextual Indicators

District Context

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending
PLEASANT GROVE INT
$10,803.03
NASH EL
$13,567.97
Local revenue share
PLEASANT GROVE INT
52.1%
NASH EL
33.3%
State revenue share
PLEASANT GROVE INT
39.2%
NASH EL
41.6%
Federal revenue share
PLEASANT GROVE INT
8.6%
NASH EL
25.1%
District chronic absenteeism rate
PLEASANT GROVE INT
10.7%
NASH EL
25.5%

County Economics

Both schools are located in the same county.

Median household income
Bowie County
$59,295
Bowie County
$59,295
Poverty rate
Bowie County
16.3%
Bowie County
16.3%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Bowie County
22.1%
Bowie County
22.1%
Unemployment rate
Bowie County
4.1%
Bowie County
4.1%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.