- CACTUS RANCH EL reported a higher students per counselor than CHANDLER OAKS EL (592.7:1 vs. 500:1).
- CACTUS RANCH EL reported a higher gifted & talented than CHANDLER OAKS EL (72 vs. 49).
- CHANDLER OAKS EL reported a higher chronically absent students than CACTUS RANCH EL (47 vs. 40).
- Source Data Limit: 5 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
CHANDLER OAKS EL reported a higher chronically absent students than CACTUS RANCH EL (47 vs. 40).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
CACTUS RANCH EL reported a higher gifted & talented than CHANDLER OAKS EL (72 vs. 49).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
CHANDLER OAKS EL reported a higher in-school suspensions than CACTUS RANCH EL (7 vs. 4).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
CACTUS RANCH EL reported a higher students per counselor than CHANDLER OAKS EL (592.7:1 vs. 500:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
14 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
CACTUS RANCH EL
$10,954.85
CHANDLER OAKS EL
$10,954.85
Local revenue share
CACTUS RANCH EL
82.6%
CHANDLER OAKS EL
82.6%
State revenue share
CACTUS RANCH EL
8.9%
CHANDLER OAKS EL
8.9%
Federal revenue share
CACTUS RANCH EL
8.5%
CHANDLER OAKS EL
8.5%
District chronic absenteeism rate
CACTUS RANCH EL
19.5%
CHANDLER OAKS EL
19.5%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Williamson County
$108,309
Williamson County
$108,309
Poverty rate
Williamson County
6.3%
Williamson County
6.3%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Williamson County
47.4%
Williamson County
47.4%
Unemployment rate
Williamson County
3.6%
Williamson County
3.6%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.