- Layton High reported a higher chronically absent students than No. UT. Acad. for Math Engineering & Science (713 vs. 58).
- Layton High reported a higher graduating cohort than No. UT. Acad. for Math Engineering & Science (594 vs. 224).
- Layton High reported a higher ap enrollment than No. UT. Acad. for Math Engineering & Science (374 vs. 85).
- Source Data Limit: 11 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
- Source Data Limit: 1 additional metric is reported by only one school.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
Layton High reported a higher chronically absent students than No. UT. Acad. for Math Engineering & Science (713 vs. 58).
Graduation Outcomes
Cohort completion rates reported to federal agencies
Layton High reported a higher graduating cohort than No. UT. Acad. for Math Engineering & Science (594 vs. 224).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
Layton High reported a higher ap enrollment than No. UT. Acad. for Math Engineering & Science (374 vs. 85).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
Layton High reported a higher violent incidents than No. UT. Acad. for Math Engineering & Science (65 vs. 0).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
Layton High reported a higher students per counselor than No. UT. Acad. for Math Engineering & Science (363.5:1 vs. 240.3:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
22 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Reported Only at Layton High
1 metric was reported by Layton High. Comparable data for No. UT. Acad. for Math Engineering & Science is missing or suppressed.
Graduation rate
92%
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
No. UT. Acad. for Math Engineering & Science
$18,421.43
Layton High
$9,986.02
Local revenue share
No. UT. Acad. for Math Engineering & Science
3.5%
Layton High
38.2%
State revenue share
No. UT. Acad. for Math Engineering & Science
95.4%
Layton High
53%
Federal revenue share
No. UT. Acad. for Math Engineering & Science
1.1%
Layton High
8.8%
District chronic absenteeism rate
No. UT. Acad. for Math Engineering & Science
9.4%
Layton High
22.9%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Davis County
$108,058
Davis County
$108,058
Poverty rate
Davis County
6%
Davis County
6%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Davis County
38.7%
Davis County
38.7%
Unemployment rate
Davis County
2.9%
Davis County
2.9%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.