- Burch Creek School reported a higher students per counselor than Thomas O. Smith School (553:1 vs. 297:1).
- Burch Creek School reported a higher chronically absent students than Thomas O. Smith School (216 vs. 184).
- Thomas O. Smith School reported a higher in-school suspensions than Burch Creek School (23 vs. 3).
- Source Data Limit: 6 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
Burch Creek School reported a higher chronically absent students than Thomas O. Smith School (216 vs. 184).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
Thomas O. Smith School reported a higher in-school suspensions than Burch Creek School (23 vs. 3).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
Burch Creek School reported a higher students per counselor than Thomas O. Smith School (553:1 vs. 297:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
14 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Thomas O. Smith School
$12,734.06
Burch Creek School
$9,769.82
Local revenue share
Thomas O. Smith School
41.8%
Burch Creek School
40.8%
State revenue share
Thomas O. Smith School
40.2%
Burch Creek School
51.8%
Federal revenue share
Thomas O. Smith School
18%
Burch Creek School
7.4%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Thomas O. Smith School
40.9%
Burch Creek School
30.3%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Weber County
$87,083
Weber County
$87,083
Poverty rate
Weber County
7.5%
Weber County
7.5%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Weber County
28.1%
Weber County
28.1%
Unemployment rate
Weber County
3.2%
Weber County
3.2%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.