- OSCAR SMITH MIDDLE reported a higher violent incidents than INDIAN RIVER MIDDLE (297 vs. 185).
- OSCAR SMITH MIDDLE reported a higher students per counselor than INDIAN RIVER MIDDLE (337:1 vs. 244.3:1).
- OSCAR SMITH MIDDLE reported a higher chronically absent students than INDIAN RIVER MIDDLE (221 vs. 145).
- Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
OSCAR SMITH MIDDLE reported a higher chronically absent students than INDIAN RIVER MIDDLE (221 vs. 145).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
OSCAR SMITH MIDDLE reported a higher gifted & talented than INDIAN RIVER MIDDLE (59 vs. 48).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
OSCAR SMITH MIDDLE reported a higher violent incidents than INDIAN RIVER MIDDLE (297 vs. 185).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
OSCAR SMITH MIDDLE reported a higher students per counselor than INDIAN RIVER MIDDLE (337:1 vs. 244.3:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
13 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
INDIAN RIVER MIDDLE
$15,274.2
OSCAR SMITH MIDDLE
$15,274.2
Local revenue share
INDIAN RIVER MIDDLE
46.5%
OSCAR SMITH MIDDLE
46.5%
State revenue share
INDIAN RIVER MIDDLE
43.1%
OSCAR SMITH MIDDLE
43.1%
Federal revenue share
INDIAN RIVER MIDDLE
10.4%
OSCAR SMITH MIDDLE
10.4%
District chronic absenteeism rate
INDIAN RIVER MIDDLE
13.1%
OSCAR SMITH MIDDLE
13.1%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Chesapeake city
$94,189
Chesapeake city
$94,189
Poverty rate
Chesapeake city
8.7%
Chesapeake city
8.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Chesapeake city
36.4%
Chesapeake city
36.4%
Unemployment rate
Chesapeake city
2.9%
Chesapeake city
2.9%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.