- C. HUNTER RITCHIE ELEM reported a higher students per counselor than W.G. COLEMAN ELEM (496:1 vs. 322:1).
- C. HUNTER RITCHIE ELEM reported a higher gifted & talented than W.G. COLEMAN ELEM (91 vs. 38).
- C. HUNTER RITCHIE ELEM reported a higher chronically absent students than W.G. COLEMAN ELEM (63 vs. 45).
- Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
C. HUNTER RITCHIE ELEM reported a higher chronically absent students than W.G. COLEMAN ELEM (63 vs. 45).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
C. HUNTER RITCHIE ELEM reported a higher gifted & talented than W.G. COLEMAN ELEM (91 vs. 38).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
W.G. COLEMAN ELEM reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than C. HUNTER RITCHIE ELEM (3 vs. 1).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
C. HUNTER RITCHIE ELEM reported a higher students per counselor than W.G. COLEMAN ELEM (496:1 vs. 322:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
11 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
W.G. COLEMAN ELEM
$15,816.55
C. HUNTER RITCHIE ELEM
$15,816.55
Local revenue share
W.G. COLEMAN ELEM
57.4%
C. HUNTER RITCHIE ELEM
57.4%
State revenue share
W.G. COLEMAN ELEM
35.3%
C. HUNTER RITCHIE ELEM
35.3%
Federal revenue share
W.G. COLEMAN ELEM
7.3%
C. HUNTER RITCHIE ELEM
7.3%
District chronic absenteeism rate
W.G. COLEMAN ELEM
15.9%
C. HUNTER RITCHIE ELEM
15.9%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Fauquier County
$129,495
Fauquier County
$129,495
Poverty rate
Fauquier County
6.2%
Fauquier County
6.2%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Fauquier County
39.7%
Fauquier County
39.7%
Unemployment rate
Fauquier County
2.3%
Fauquier County
2.3%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.