- GEORGE W. CARVER ELEM reported a higher chronically absent students than GINTER PARK ELEM (185 vs. 66).
- GEORGE W. CARVER ELEM reported a higher students per counselor than GINTER PARK ELEM (379:1 vs. 278:1).
- GEORGE W. CARVER ELEM reported a higher violent incidents than GINTER PARK ELEM (83 vs. 47).
- Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
GEORGE W. CARVER ELEM reported a higher chronically absent students than GINTER PARK ELEM (185 vs. 66).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
GINTER PARK ELEM reported a higher gifted & talented than GEORGE W. CARVER ELEM (23 vs. 20).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
GEORGE W. CARVER ELEM reported a higher violent incidents than GINTER PARK ELEM (83 vs. 47).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
GEORGE W. CARVER ELEM reported a higher students per counselor than GINTER PARK ELEM (379:1 vs. 278:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
12 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
GINTER PARK ELEM
$21,413.44
GEORGE W. CARVER ELEM
$21,413.44
Local revenue share
GINTER PARK ELEM
44.6%
GEORGE W. CARVER ELEM
44.6%
State revenue share
GINTER PARK ELEM
33.2%
GEORGE W. CARVER ELEM
33.2%
Federal revenue share
GINTER PARK ELEM
22.2%
GEORGE W. CARVER ELEM
22.2%
District chronic absenteeism rate
GINTER PARK ELEM
24.6%
GEORGE W. CARVER ELEM
24.6%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Richmond city
$62,671
Richmond city
$62,671
Poverty rate
Richmond city
18.8%
Richmond city
18.8%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Richmond city
44.1%
Richmond city
44.1%
Unemployment rate
Richmond city
3.2%
Richmond city
3.2%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.