- MILES JONES ELEM reported a higher chronically absent students than J.B. FISHER ELEM (110 vs. 36).
- MILES JONES ELEM reported a higher gifted & talented than J.B. FISHER ELEM (56 vs. 35).
- MILES JONES ELEM reported a higher in-school suspensions than J.B. FISHER ELEM (16 vs. 0).
- Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
MILES JONES ELEM reported a higher chronically absent students than J.B. FISHER ELEM (110 vs. 36).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
MILES JONES ELEM reported a higher gifted & talented than J.B. FISHER ELEM (56 vs. 35).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
MILES JONES ELEM reported a higher in-school suspensions than J.B. FISHER ELEM (16 vs. 0).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
MILES JONES ELEM reported a higher students per counselor than J.B. FISHER ELEM (264.5:1 vs. 251:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
12 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
J.B. FISHER ELEM
$21,413.44
MILES JONES ELEM
$21,413.44
Local revenue share
J.B. FISHER ELEM
44.6%
MILES JONES ELEM
44.6%
State revenue share
J.B. FISHER ELEM
33.2%
MILES JONES ELEM
33.2%
Federal revenue share
J.B. FISHER ELEM
22.2%
MILES JONES ELEM
22.2%
District chronic absenteeism rate
J.B. FISHER ELEM
24.6%
MILES JONES ELEM
24.6%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Richmond city
$62,671
Richmond city
$62,671
Poverty rate
Richmond city
18.8%
Richmond city
18.8%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Richmond city
44.1%
Richmond city
44.1%
Unemployment rate
Richmond city
3.2%
Richmond city
3.2%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.