- HERMAN L. HORN ELEM reported a higher students per counselor than MT. PLEASANT ELEM (401:1 vs. 252:1).
- HERMAN L. HORN ELEM reported a higher chronically absent students than MT. PLEASANT ELEM (64 vs. 37).
- HERMAN L. HORN ELEM reported a higher gifted & talented than MT. PLEASANT ELEM (21 vs. 8).
- Source Data Limit: 6 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
HERMAN L. HORN ELEM reported a higher chronically absent students than MT. PLEASANT ELEM (64 vs. 37).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
HERMAN L. HORN ELEM reported a higher gifted & talented than MT. PLEASANT ELEM (21 vs. 8).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
HERMAN L. HORN ELEM reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than MT. PLEASANT ELEM (11 vs. 0).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
HERMAN L. HORN ELEM reported a higher students per counselor than MT. PLEASANT ELEM (401:1 vs. 252:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
10 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
HERMAN L. HORN ELEM
$13,364.64
MT. PLEASANT ELEM
$13,364.64
Local revenue share
HERMAN L. HORN ELEM
42.6%
MT. PLEASANT ELEM
42.6%
State revenue share
HERMAN L. HORN ELEM
49.5%
MT. PLEASANT ELEM
49.5%
Federal revenue share
HERMAN L. HORN ELEM
7.9%
MT. PLEASANT ELEM
7.9%
District chronic absenteeism rate
HERMAN L. HORN ELEM
15.3%
MT. PLEASANT ELEM
15.3%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Roanoke County
$82,931
Roanoke County
$82,931
Poverty rate
Roanoke County
7.3%
Roanoke County
7.3%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Roanoke County
37.4%
Roanoke County
37.4%
Unemployment rate
Roanoke County
2.7%
Roanoke County
2.7%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.