- WEBER CITY ELEM reported a higher students per counselor than YUMA ELEM (340:1 vs. 142:1).
- WEBER CITY ELEM reported a higher chronically absent students than YUMA ELEM (41 vs. 14).
- WEBER CITY ELEM reported a higher gifted & talented than YUMA ELEM (5 vs. 3).
- Source Data Limit: 4 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
WEBER CITY ELEM reported a higher chronically absent students than YUMA ELEM (41 vs. 14).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
WEBER CITY ELEM reported a higher gifted & talented than YUMA ELEM (5 vs. 3).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
WEBER CITY ELEM reported a higher students per counselor than YUMA ELEM (340:1 vs. 142:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
5 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
WEBER CITY ELEM
$12,840.71
YUMA ELEM
$12,840.71
Local revenue share
WEBER CITY ELEM
15.4%
YUMA ELEM
15.4%
State revenue share
WEBER CITY ELEM
73.7%
YUMA ELEM
73.7%
Federal revenue share
WEBER CITY ELEM
10.9%
YUMA ELEM
10.9%
District chronic absenteeism rate
WEBER CITY ELEM
13.5%
YUMA ELEM
13.5%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Scott County
$45,136
Scott County
$45,136
Poverty rate
Scott County
18%
Scott County
18%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Scott County
14.3%
Scott County
14.3%
Unemployment rate
Scott County
3.4%
Scott County
3.4%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.