- RICHLANDS ELEM reported a higher students per counselor than CEDAR BLUFF ELEM (605:1 vs. 394:1).
- RICHLANDS ELEM reported a higher chronically absent students than CEDAR BLUFF ELEM (190 vs. 137).
- CEDAR BLUFF ELEM reported a higher in-school suspensions than RICHLANDS ELEM (10 vs. 1).
- Source Data Limit: 6 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
RICHLANDS ELEM reported a higher chronically absent students than CEDAR BLUFF ELEM (190 vs. 137).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
RICHLANDS ELEM reported a higher gifted & talented than CEDAR BLUFF ELEM (26 vs. 25).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
CEDAR BLUFF ELEM reported a higher in-school suspensions than RICHLANDS ELEM (10 vs. 1).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
RICHLANDS ELEM reported a higher students per counselor than CEDAR BLUFF ELEM (605:1 vs. 394:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
7 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
CEDAR BLUFF ELEM
$13,164.7
RICHLANDS ELEM
$13,164.7
Local revenue share
CEDAR BLUFF ELEM
20.8%
RICHLANDS ELEM
20.8%
State revenue share
CEDAR BLUFF ELEM
66%
RICHLANDS ELEM
66%
Federal revenue share
CEDAR BLUFF ELEM
13.3%
RICHLANDS ELEM
13.3%
District chronic absenteeism rate
CEDAR BLUFF ELEM
30.6%
RICHLANDS ELEM
30.6%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Tazewell County
$45,788
Tazewell County
$45,788
Poverty rate
Tazewell County
19.3%
Tazewell County
19.3%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Tazewell County
16.4%
Tazewell County
16.4%
Unemployment rate
Tazewell County
4.2%
Tazewell County
4.2%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.