- Seth G. Haley School reported a higher chronically absent students than Live Oaks School (49 vs. 35).
- Live Oaks School reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than Seth G. Haley School (1 vs. 0).
- Source Data Limit: 2 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
- Source Data Limit: 2 additional metrics are reported by only one school.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
Seth G. Haley School reported a higher chronically absent students than Live Oaks School (49 vs. 35).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
Live Oaks School reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than Seth G. Haley School (1 vs. 0).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
10 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Reported Only at Live Oaks School
2 metrics were reported by Live Oaks School. Comparable data for Seth G. Haley School is missing or suppressed.
Gifted & talented
5
Students per counselor
224:1
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Live Oaks School
$27,086.4
Seth G. Haley School
$21,199.13
Local revenue share
Live Oaks School
75.6%
Seth G. Haley School
35.8%
State revenue share
Live Oaks School
19.4%
Seth G. Haley School
52%
Federal revenue share
Live Oaks School
5%
Seth G. Haley School
12.2%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Live Oaks School
13.9%
Seth G. Haley School
25.1%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
$86,266
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
$86,266
Poverty rate
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
11.6%
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
11.6%
Bachelor's degree or higher
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
41.1%
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
41.1%
Unemployment rate
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
3.2%
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
3.2%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.