- Howe-Manning reported a higher chronically absent students than Ivan G Smith (39 vs. 27).
- Howe-Manning reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than Ivan G Smith (1 vs. 0).
- Source Data Limit: 2 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
- Source Data Limit: 2 additional metrics are reported by only one school.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
Howe-Manning reported a higher chronically absent students than Ivan G Smith (39 vs. 27).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
Howe-Manning reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than Ivan G Smith (1 vs. 0).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
11 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Reported Only at Howe-Manning
2 metrics were reported by Howe-Manning. Comparable data for Ivan G Smith is missing or suppressed.
Gifted & talented
22
Students per counselor
420:1
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Ivan G Smith
$20,706.74
Howe-Manning
$23,157.24
Local revenue share
Ivan G Smith
69.2%
Howe-Manning
34.1%
State revenue share
Ivan G Smith
24.7%
Howe-Manning
54.8%
Federal revenue share
Ivan G Smith
6.2%
Howe-Manning
11.1%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Ivan G Smith
19.1%
Howe-Manning
10.9%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Essex County
$99,431
Essex County
$99,431
Poverty rate
Essex County
9.4%
Essex County
9.4%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Essex County
42.3%
Essex County
42.3%
Unemployment rate
Essex County
4.1%
Essex County
4.1%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.