- HOOVER ES reported a higher chronically absent students than EISENHOWER ES (50 vs. 25).
- HOOVER ES reported a higher gifted & talented than EISENHOWER ES (15 vs. 4).
- HOOVER ES reported a higher students per counselor than EISENHOWER ES (277:1 vs. 272:1).
- Source Data Limit: 4 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
HOOVER ES reported a higher chronically absent students than EISENHOWER ES (50 vs. 25).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
HOOVER ES reported a higher gifted & talented than EISENHOWER ES (15 vs. 4).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
HOOVER ES reported a higher students per counselor than EISENHOWER ES (277:1 vs. 272:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
11 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
EISENHOWER ES
$9,917.86
HOOVER ES
$9,917.86
Local revenue share
EISENHOWER ES
32.7%
HOOVER ES
32.7%
State revenue share
EISENHOWER ES
51.5%
HOOVER ES
51.5%
Federal revenue share
EISENHOWER ES
15.8%
HOOVER ES
15.8%
District chronic absenteeism rate
EISENHOWER ES
21.5%
HOOVER ES
21.5%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Garfield County
$67,302
Garfield County
$67,302
Poverty rate
Garfield County
12.7%
Garfield County
12.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Garfield County
22.3%
Garfield County
22.3%
Unemployment rate
Garfield County
3.3%
Garfield County
3.3%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.