The top reported proficiency rate is 66% in English language arts. The lowest is 39% in Science.
Original Research by School Decision on Scottsdale Preparatory Academy (89756)
Scottsdale Preparatory Academy operates as a single-school charter district within the Great Hearts Academies network, serving students in grades five through twelve. The campus is located in Maricopa County, and the district’s governance structure means that school-level and district-level information are essentially the same. For a family considering this school, the academic picture comes mainly from state assessments in grades six through eight, along with a single year of science testing in grade eight. High school–level achievement data and a four-year graduation rate were not available in the reporting used here, so the full picture of outcomes for older students will require direct inquiry.
On the assessments that were reported, a majority of students met proficiency in English language arts across grades six through eight, with performance in math a bit lower but still at a level where roughly half of students scored proficient. Science in grade eight showed a smaller share reaching proficiency, a soft spot that a parent may want to explore further with the school, particularly for students planning to pursue STEM coursework in high school. When placed among Maricopa County’s districts, the school’s overall proficiency across tested subjects and grades sits above the midpoint, a clear strength. Chronic absenteeism is low compared with other districts in the county, landing in the top quartile—meaning the school has relatively few students missing school frequently, a sign of consistent attendance.
The student body is predominantly White, with Asian and Hispanic students as the next largest groups. The shares of Black, Native American, and Pacific Islander students are each small. Data on the share of students who qualify for free or reduced-price meals, as well as counts of students with disabilities and English learners, were not included in the available records, so the school’s approach to support services for these populations is something a family would need to ask about directly.
Per-pupil current spending is in the middle range, upper half among the county’s districts, and is not an outlier. The school’s budget and operational context are typical for a district of this type. No recent parent-relevant changes—such as curriculum shifts, boundary adjustments, or facility referendums—were found in publicly available sources. The school appears to be in a steady administrative state, which may appeal to families looking for stability.
Because the school’s grade span covers middle and high school years, a family should note that the testing data reflects only the middle grades. For a full view of academic expectations and outcomes in high school, including graduation rates, college readiness indicators, and course offerings, it would be wise to speak directly with the school. The absence of that data in this profile is not unusual for a school that may not yet have a long track record of high school testing under the current assessment system, but it does mean the available evidence is partial.
For a parent or resident, the profile that emerges is of a mid-sized charter school with solid academic performance in the tested middle grades, strong attendance, and a demographic makeup that is not highly diverse. The school’s standing above the county midpoint on proficiency is a positive signal. The main open questions center on high school outcomes and student support services, both of which are unaddressed by the data at hand.
See more original research from School Decision →