Original Research by School Decision on Collegiate Charter High School of Los Angeles District
Collegiate Charter High School of Los Angeles District operates a single high school serving grades nine through twelve. The enrollment is small, with a total student body distributed across the four high school grades.
The student population is distinctly concentrated. Nearly all students identify as Hispanic, with a very small number of students identifying as Black or White. The data available does not include counts for free-or-reduced-price lunch eligibility, students receiving special education services, or English learners, so the full economic and academic-support context remains unclear. A parent may want to reach out to the school directly to understand these enrollment characteristics more fully.
State testing results and graduation rate data were not available in the public reporting we reviewed. This absence of proficiency measures and completion data is notable; for a high school serving this age band, those metrics typically appear. The reasons for their absence here are not explained in the available data, and a parent seeking to assess the school's academic standing would need to contact the district or school for that information.
Within Los Angeles County's broader universe of districts, the one available comparison point is chronic absenteeism. The district's rate falls in the bottom quartile among county districts, meaning attendance is a concern relative to peers. Per-pupil spending is in the upper range for the county, suggesting the district is allocating resources at a level higher than the median district in the region.
Recent district developments or strategic changes were not found in available public sources, so the school's direction and priorities are not clear from outside information. The district operates only the single Collegiate Charter High School campus, making this a focused, small operation rather than a multi-school system.
For a family considering this school, the immediate questions center on academic performance, support services, and attendance patterns. The proficiency and graduation data gap is significant for high school evaluation. The elevated absenteeism rate suggests either that student engagement is a challenge, or that the school population includes students with particular barriers to regular attendance that the school is working to address. The high per-pupil spending may indicate investment in support, though what that spending covers is not detailed here. Direct conversation with the school about how it serves its student body, what its actual graduation outcomes look like, and what is driving the attendance pattern would give a clearer picture than the available data alone.
See more original research from School Decision →