Original Research by School Decision on Plummer-worley Joint District
Plummer-Worley Joint District sits in Benewah County, Idaho, serving students from prekindergarten through twelfth grade across three schools: Lakeside Elementary, Lakeside Middle, and Lakeside High. The district is small, with a total enrollment that places it among the quieter rural districts in the region. Each grade cohort is compact, which shapes both the academic experience and the way the state reports performance data.
The student body stands out for its composition. A near-majority of students identify as American Indian or Alaska Native, making this one of the districts in Idaho where Indigenous enrollment is the single largest group. White students form the next largest share, followed by students of two or more races and a smaller Hispanic population. The district did not report free-or-reduced-price lunch counts, IEP rates, or English learner figures, so the picture of economic need and special-population services is incomplete from the available data. A parent wanting to understand support services would need to ask the district directly.
On state assessments, Plummer-Worley took the Idaho ISAT in the most recent school year across math, English language arts, and science. Because each tested grade has only a handful of students, the state reports proficiency as a range rather than a single figure. In math, the upper bounds of those ranges land roughly between the mid-forties and low-sixties percent across grades three through seven, meaning the district's math proficiency could fall anywhere in a broad band depending on the true suppressed value. Grade eight math was not reported. In English language arts, the ranges are similar, with upper bounds stretching from the low-forties to the low-sixties. Science was tested only in grades five and eight, with reported ranges whose upper bounds reach into the high-fifties. The eighth-grade science tested count was suppressed. Average scale scores were not available for any grade or subject, and participation rates were missing across the board. What this means in practice is that the testing data, taken at face value, does not give a parent a clean read on where Plummer-Worley stands academically. The small cohorts make year-to-year comparisons unstable and the state's range reporting reflects that uncertainty. A parent would be well served by asking the district for classroom-level evidence, growth measures, or other indicators the state's public dashboard does not surface.
No civil-rights data, course-access information, staffing figures, or discipline records were available for this district. Program offerings were not reported. The district brief search turned up no parent-relevant changes in recent years, finding only basic demographic and fiscal profile material. A locale brief for the towns was not provided.
The housing market across the district's zip codes is uneven. The weighted typical home value sits above the Idaho state benchmark, but that average masks sharp divergence. The Worley area carries the highest home values by a wide margin and has been appreciating briskly, while the Plummer area is more modest and has been softening. Saint Maries sits in between with moderate prices and gentle growth. A sliver of the district reaches into Tekoa, where values are the lowest of the four and have been declining. The price-to-income ratio for the district is elevated relative to national norms, meaning a family earning a typical income would find homeownership here more stretched than in many parts of the country, driven largely by the Worley segment of the market.
For a family considering Plummer-Worley, the draw is a small, close-knit district where students are known individually and where Native American identity is central to the school community. The trade-off is that academic performance is hard to judge from public testing data, the cohorts are small enough that any single year's results swing widely, and program information is not publicly cataloged in the sources available. A parent making a decision here would benefit from a direct conversation with school staff about what instruction and support look like day to day, since the quantitative record leaves much to the imagination.
See more original research from School Decision →