Original Research by School Decision on Phoenix Academy Charter Public High School Chelsea (district
Phoenix Academy Charter Public High School Chelsea is a single-school district serving grades nine through twelve in Suffolk County. The school enrolls close to two hundred students, with a grade distribution that is heavily weighted toward the ninth grade; enrollment in tenth, eleventh, and twelfth grades is much smaller, a pattern that parents may want to discuss with the school. The student body is predominantly Hispanic, with smaller shares of Black, White, American Indian or Alaska Native, and multiracial students. Data on the share of students who qualify for free or reduced-price lunch, receive special education services, or are English learners were not reported, so a reader cannot draw conclusions about the economic or support-needs profile from the available numbers.
State testing results and the four-year graduation rate were both absent from the data. For a high school that serves tested grades, these are core measures of academic performance, and their absence leaves an open question for families. The school sits outside the conventional accountability framework in ways the data do not fully explain, and a parent considering this school would want to ask directly about student outcomes, particularly how students perform on state assessments and how many graduate within four years. The chronic absenteeism rate, where data are available, places the district in the bottom quartile among Suffolk County’s districts, indicating a high level of students missing substantial amounts of school. This is a soft spot worth investigating; families should ask what supports the school has in place to address attendance.
Per-pupil current spending lands in the middle range but the lower half when compared with other Suffolk County districts. This tells a reader that the school does not stand out for especially high or low resource levels relative to its peers, but without more context on how those dollars are allocated—staffing ratios, program funding, or facility costs—it is not possible to assess what the spending level means for daily experience.
The district-level research turned up no lasting parent-relevant changes, such as new leadership, boundary changes, or program launches. The school’s website and public directory entries were basic, so there is little to go on regarding recent initiatives or strategic direction.
A few structural items are also missing. No information was available on the school’s charter status, the locale type, or whether it receives Title I funding. Discipline data, course access, and staffing figures were all absent. A family looking at this school has a thin public record to evaluate, particularly on academic performance, student supports, and school climate. The most actionable next step would be to contact the school directly for classroom-level details, outcome data, and a sense of the daily instructional environment. The school serves a small, predominantly ninth-grade population, and the high chronic absenteeism rate is a factual sign that peer attendance may be a concern. For a parent weighing options, the school’s strong points are not visible in the available data, and the gaps are wide enough that the school is best approached with a list of direct questions rather than assumptions.
See more original research from School Decision →