Original Research by School Decision on Grass Range Elem
Grass Range Elem serves a small pocket of central Montana, covering pre-kindergarten through eighth grade in Fergus County. The district operates two school buildings, Grass Range School and Grass Range 7-8. Because it does not serve high school grades, there is no graduation rate to report, and the academic picture is unusually sparse for a reader trying to judge performance.
The district's state testing results for math and English language arts in grades three through eight were suppressed for the most recent year. Suppression typically occurs when the number of students tested is very small, and in a district with just over four dozen students total in a typical year, that is the likely explanation. Science testing from a prior year shows that a small group of students took the exam, but a proficiency rate was not reported in the available data. A parent considering this district will need to ask the school directly for any student-level performance information the state does not publish publicly; the public record alone does not provide a clear read on academic attainment.
Enrollment is small, as one would expect for a rural elementary district, with students spread fairly evenly across kindergarten through eighth grade. The student body is predominantly white, with a very small number of American Indian or Alaska Native students, Asian students, and Hispanic students. Information on students receiving free or reduced-price meals, students with disabilities served under an Individualized Education Program, and English learners was not available in the data reviewed. A parent may want to ask the district about its support for special populations directly.
On the school environment side, chronic absenteeism stands out as a relative strength. The district's rate places it in the top quartile among Fergus County's districts, meaning few students are missing enough school to be counted as chronically absent. That is a positive signal for daily attendance consistency in a setting where long rural bus rides or other factors can sometimes push absenteeism higher.
Per-pupil current spending is in the lower range among the county's districts. That is neither inherently good nor bad; it may reflect the efficiencies of a very small operation or a limited local tax base, but it is a data point a parent might want to understand in terms of what it buys. No information was found on course access, staffing ratios, discipline, or the district's Title I status, so the full picture of classroom resources and student support remains incomplete.
Housing context in the area the district draws from shows a moderate spread. The weighted home value across the contributing ZIP codes is below the statewide benchmark for Montana, though values have been rising. The largest weight comes from the Grass Range ZIP code itself, where values have climbed. Smaller shares of the district's weighting come from Lewistown and Roy, with Roy showing a slight decline in home values. The national median household income and a 30-year fixed mortgage rate typical of the period provide broader economic context, but no district-specific income data was available.
The district brief turned up no evidence of recent referenda, curriculum changes, property tax shifts, or other lasting changes that would typically matter to a parent. That does not mean nothing has happened; it means the public record does not show it for this very small rural district. A family moving into the area should plan to reach out to the district office directly for any information about upcoming adjustments or priorities.
This is a place that fits a family seeking a very small, rural elementary setting where the peer group is small and the surrounding community is spread across multiple small towns and unincorporated areas. The academic data is too thin to evaluate performance, and the district does not serve high school students, so families will need a plan for grades nine through twelve elsewhere. The chronic absenteeism record is encouraging, but the gaps in what is publicly reported mean anyone considering this district will need to gather additional information directly from the school to form a full picture.
See more original research from School Decision →