Original Research by School Decision on North Harlem Colony Elem
North Harlem Colony Elementary serves students from prekindergarten through eighth grade in Blaine County, Montana. This is a single-school district, and it is an unusually small one. The entire district enrolled a tiny number of students, all of whom were in a single grade. The student body was entirely white.
Because of the district’s size and the grade levels it serves, there is essentially no standardized testing data to report. State testing is typically administered in grades three through eight, but in this case no results were available for math, English language arts, or science. There is no graduation rate to speak of because the district does not serve high school grades; it ends at eighth grade. A parent looking at this district will find no academic performance measures to compare with other schools or districts. That is not a sign of anything amiss—it is a direct consequence of having so few students enrolled in the tested grade range that the state likely suppressed the data for privacy reasons, or there were no students enrolled in those tested grades at all.
The comparison with other districts in Blaine County yields a few pieces of context. Chronic absenteeism was reported at a very low rate, in the top quartile among the county’s districts, meaning that on this measure the district is in a favorable position relative to its peers. Per-pupil current spending fell in the lower range among county districts, which is notable given that very small districts often spend more per student due to fixed costs. The housing context for the area shows that typical home values in the ZIP code serving the district are well below the state median, and affordability relative to national income is favorable, though these are general area characteristics rather than specifics tied to the school itself.
A search for recent district changes—such as referenda, curriculum shifts, or property-tax proposals—turned up no news. This is a very small rural district, and the public record on it is thin. That lack of information is itself information: the district appears to operate without the kind of visible upheaval or public debate that surfaces in larger communities.
For a family considering this district, the essential fact is its size. There are effectively no peers in a building of this enrollment scale. The academic pathway is not measured or benchmarked in the way most parents expect. The peer environment is a handful of students, all from the same racial background. The housing market in the surrounding area is affordable relative to the state, but a family would need to look into how far this district’s boundaries stretch and what the commute looks like. The district serves only elementary and middle grades, so a family would need to plan for a high school placement elsewhere, likely in a neighboring district or through an alternative arrangement.
This is a place that fits a family seeking an extremely small educational setting, where the classroom is effectively the whole school, and where standardized performance data is simply not available to guide a decision. A parent would want to speak directly with the staff and understand the instructional approach, since there is no public data to consult. The district appears stable and low-profile, but the lack of measurable academic context means any judgment about academic quality would have to come from firsthand experience rather than reportable results.
See more original research from School Decision →