Original Research by School Decision on The Franklin School of Innovation
The Franklin School of Innovation is a charter district serving grades five through twelve in Buncombe County, North Carolina. It is a unified entity: a single school housing both middle and high school under one educational model, which is the Expeditionary Learning framework. This distinction matters for families considering enrollment, because unlike a traditional district with multiple schools and varying approaches, FSI operates as one pedagogical community.
The school's enrollment is modest, distributed across both grade bands. The student body is predominantly white, with smaller populations of students identifying as multiracial, Hispanic, Black, and Asian. Specific counts for students receiving free or reduced-price lunch, identified for special education services, or designated as English learners were not available; a parent may want to ask the school directly about these populations to understand peer composition and support capacity.
FSI's approach centers on Expeditionary Learning, a model that defines success through mastery of knowledge and skills, character development, and high-quality work rather than through grades alone. The school recently earned formal credential status from EL Education, an independent affirmation that it meets the organization's standards for implementing the model across its structures. This includes Crew advisories, which function as small advisory groups, and Learning Expeditions, extended project-based units that drive instruction. For families drawn to project-based, competency-focused learning, this credential offers concrete evidence that the school has sustained and refined this approach over years.
State-level proficiency data for this school were not available in the data obtained, and the school's graduation rate was not reported. These are significant gaps for any parent evaluating high school outcomes. Without these metrics, families cannot assess how well FSI's expeditionary model translates into measurable academic performance or college readiness by state standards. The school's website or a direct conversation with leadership would be necessary to fill this picture.
What is measurable is chronic absenteeism. FSI's rate places it in the bottom quartile among Buncombe County's districts. This is a real pattern worth understanding. High absenteeism can signal challenges in student engagement, transportation logistics, or school fit. It may also reflect the nature of project-based learning, which sometimes calls for off-campus fieldwork or expeditions that are reported differently. Either way, a prospective family should ask the school what drives this figure and what attendance support looks like in practice.
Per-pupil spending at FSI falls in the lower range compared to peer districts in the county, a fact that may reflect charter school funding structures or operational choices. The school currently operates as a single in-person campus, though it has recently launched the Innovation Career Academy, a primarily virtual high school track for grades nine through twelve. This option includes in-person extracurriculars, access to dual-credit coursework at a local community college, and flexibility in diploma pathways, making it a genuine alternative for students who prefer asynchronous learning or have been homeschooling.
A new athletic turf field is now complete, and the school has joined a conference within the Carolina Athletic Association for Schools of Choice, enabling competitive sports with home games. For a charter school previously without dedicated athletic infrastructure, this is a material expansion of what families can expect for their high school students.
The Franklin School of Innovation appeals to families committed to expeditionary, project-based learning and willing to accept a nontraditional structure. It offers a coherent pedagogical identity backed by credential validation, growing extracurricular infrastructure, and flexibility through its new virtual pathway. What remains unclear from available data is how this model performs against state academic benchmarks and whether its documented attendance challenges reflect a temporary pattern, a structural feature of the program, or a concern for prospective families to investigate closely with the school.
See more original research from School Decision →