Original Research by School Decision on Elgin-new Leipzig 49
Elgin-New Leipzig 49 is a small rural public school district in North Dakota, serving students from pre-kindergarten through twelfth grade across two schools, an elementary and a high school. The district sits in Grant County, with housing data drawing from the Lemmon and Glen Ullin postal areas. This is the kind of place where a single district covers a wide grade span for a tight-knit community, and the enrollment is small enough that each grade-level cohort can be counted on one hand.
The student body is predominantly white, with a Hispanic presence and a smaller group identifying as two or more races. A few students identify as Asian, Black, or American Indian and Alaska Native. Beyond race and ethnicity, the demographic picture thins out. Free and reduced-price lunch data was not available, and the district did not report figures for special education or English learner populations, so parents wanting that context would need to ask the district directly.
On state assessments, the district uses North Dakota's A-PLUS system, and the most recent results show genuine variation across grades and subjects. In math, the middle elementary grades are mixed, with fourth grade landing on the lower end while fifth and sixth grades show strong proficiency. Seventh grade holds up well. Eighth grade math drops off sharply, landing in the lower range. The pattern in English language arts is more consistent, hovering in the mid-range across most grades, with sixth grade the brightest spot. Science results are sparse, with only two grades tested. Fourth-grade science sits low while eighth-grade science lands in the mid-range. Participation across all tested grades and subjects was reported at a level below full enrollment, which can reflect small cohorts, absences, or opt-outs in a district this size.
One thing worth knowing is that North Dakota changed its assessment name and cut scores for this testing cycle, which means the results are not directly comparable to prior years. The data flags this explicitly, and trend analysis is not possible. So parents looking at whether performance is improving or declining over time will not find that answer in the current numbers.
The district has no graduation rate in the provided data, no course access or program listing, and no staffing, discipline, or attendance figures. The civil-rights data section was also absent. These gaps mean the portrait here is partial. A school of this size in a rural setting may not generate all of these data points through standard reporting channels, and some fields may simply not apply, but a parent would be right to seek more detail from the district on graduation outcomes and program offerings.
Housing in the district's area is very affordable relative to both state and national benchmarks. Home values sit well below the North Dakota median and far below the national figure, and the price-to-income ratio suggests that buying a home here is within reach for households earning around the national median income. Rental data was not available. The housing market has seen a modest recent uptick in values.
A search for recent parent-relevant district changes, including referendums, curriculum updates, property tax shifts, or facility decisions, turned up little. Publicly available information covered basic demographics and ratings but did not surface any major policy or operational changes in the recent span.
What this district offers is a small-scale, rural educational setting where class sizes are naturally small and the community is tight. The academic results are uneven, with real strengths in the upper elementary math grades and softer spots in fourth grade and eighth-grade math that a parent may want to look into further with the school. The missing data fields limit how full a picture one can draw from the available sources alone.
See more original research from School Decision →